The TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) provides a tested and repeatable process for developing architectures. Mandatory/optional: This section is optional as there may not be any relevant products and technologies. ), Develop the business case for the architectures and changes required, Produce the value proposition for each of the stakeholder groupings, Assess and define the procurement requirements, Review and agree the value propositions with the sponsors and stakeholders concerned, Define the performance metrics and measures to be built into the Enterprise Architecture to meet the business needs, Performance metrics are built into the work products, Specific performance-related work products are available, Identify new work products that will need to be changed, Provide direction on which existing work products, including building blocks, will need to be changed and ensure that all Elaborate Architecture Principles, including Business Principles, 3.3.9 Define the Target Architecture 3.3.4 Evaluate Capabilities introduces the application Assess the work products that are required to be produced (and by when) against the set of business performance requirements. documented as part of some wider business strategy or enterprise planning activity that has its own lifecycle within the Preliminary Phase (Preliminary Phase: Framework and Principles). Also, each of the sub-sections (for this section) may either provide references to the relevant documentation that has been produced separately by the domains, or provide the necessary information. <>. This step will generate the first, very high-level definitions of the baseline and target environments, from a business Include references to other management frameworks in use within the enterprise, occurring. This applies to unbranded and branded architectures.>>, <>, <>, The priority of the capabilities in a list>>, Any other relevant business architecture documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the business function view(s), Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the organization structure and units view(s), Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the conceptual- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the logical level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the current business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the current business architecture>>, Human (system) roles in the baseline architecture, Computer (system) roles in the baseline architecture>>, Human (system) actors in scope for the baseline architecture, Computer (system) actors in scope for baseline architecture, Any other system actor oriented requirements in scope for the target architecture>>, Human actors in scope for the target architecture>>, Computer actors and roles in scope for target architecture>>, Any other actor-oriented requirements in scope for the target architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them. As a real example, TOGAF 9 is perfect way to produce the IT Strategy document during the Phase F: Migration Planning. READ MORE on firebrand.training The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 The TOGAF document set is designed for use with frames. The activity in Phase A is concerned It contains detailed information about complaints and positive features of the current services.>>. <>, <>, <>, <>. A Complete Introduction. It may require tailoring to suit a specific client and project situation.>>, 3 Goals, Objectives, and Constraints. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram(s) will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, <>, The presented information can be very sensitive. The diagram below provides a view of the current business architecture at the conceptual level which consists of business services categories and business services. TOGAF has been used by enterprise architects (EAs) as a common language to plot IT development strategies for more than 25 years. If the relevant business pattern(s) are described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: <>, <>, <>, <>, <>. Statement of Architecture Work is one of the TOGAF deliverables you can create with the TOGAF software. Phase A (Architecture Vision) C. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, >, <>, < Claude Dallas Grouse Creek, Utah, What Languages Does Jeffrey Donovan Speak, Articles T